Wednesday,
November 29, 2000
Part IV
The author of this book on the
political trials during and after the
Civil War, a Mr. Renfro, a very passionate
Democrat, describes another
Radical-Republican office seeker in the
1871 election year, A Mr. Dunn. Mr. Renfro
states; " Dunn wandered into
Montgomery County between 1865 and 1870.
Having little money, he opened a bar or
drinking shop," the following
description by author Renfro of Mr. Dunn
is so amazingly an exact description of
many of our Republican-Democrat office
seekers as to be mind-boggling. He
describes candidate Dunn as "at that
time I think his taxable property
consisted of one very ordinary head,
graced by a taller face, which showed
forth in its countenance that the owner
knew very little if anything about the
maneuvering of the two great political
parties in our county." (Our year
2000 Presidential race an almost exact
copy). To continue Mr. Renfro’s account
of that 1871 candidate race for Sheriff’s
office, he states that "our young
hero of the ‘Bulldozing’ variety
concluded he would run for that office. He
was too late to announce his intentions
because Mr. Womack had already been chosen
as the Radical-Republican candidate and
Mr. D--had no alternative but to offer
himself as a Democrat and he promised if
elected to adhere strictly to the
principals of the democrat party. He was
defeated by the Republican Womack. Our
hero D-- said he was consoled by the fact
that he received a majority of the votes
cast by the honest and intelligent
Democrats of the county. However, a short
few months after the election, Mr. Womack
resigned the office of Sheriff. He left
the office to be filled by appointment and
Mr. D--quickly used the help of his former
Republican friends and got the job. He
then realized that his chances of being
elected to the job rather than by
appointment would be much better as a
Republican, so he accordingly declared
that he was a Republican and always had
been. When challenged by his Democratic
friends as a traitor to the party, he
declared that he had only done that so he
could keep a Radical-Republican out of the
office." Ho-Hum. If I didn’t have
proof this article was written in 1872, I
would declare it dated Nov. 7, 2000.
In 1878, again the Democrats of Bethel
(this account is written by the Democrat
T.J. Renfro), describing what happened at
the political Barbecue at Bethel involving
the radical R.B. Rentfro. (Note the
similarity and the equally difference in
the spelling of the author Renfro and his
enemy Rentfro) Renfro states "R.B.
Rentfro drifted into this county
(Montgomery County) soon after the close
of the war. He was of the legal profession
and could have become one of the brightest
lights that ever illuminated the Legal
Bar, had it not been for his greedy desire
for money and notoriety. (What’s new
about that?). when the Bethel democrats
held their political rally at Bethel in
August 1878, Rentfro appeared without
being invited, he being well-known as a
Radical-Republican. This Rentfro was the
instigator of a plan to abolish enough of
the voting boxes of the County as to cut
the Democratic votes in half. Rentfro
boasting that ‘the d____d Democrats
wouldn’t ride 30 to 40 miles to vote’.
When one of the Democratic office-holders
of Montgomery County angrily accosted
Rentfro verbally about his plan, Rentfro
replied that the Democrats should
submit(note Nov. 10, 2000), his words ‘the
Democrats should tamely submit’ spoken
by the Republican candidate Mr. Rentfro
and written down by the book author R.B.
Renfro, a Democrat, (was almost word for
word what I heard spoken by a Republican
office-seeker today on Channel Two
television at eleven o’clock, Nov. 11,
2000. Can you believe the identical
parties, the identical reasons, the
identical words were spoken in this
Presidential election one hundred and
twenty two years later? I’m sure our
present day political conflict will end
rationally).
The author Renfro writes that the
Republican candidate Rentfro continued his
declaration that "if the Democrats
did not submit, he would raise an armed
force of Republicans and cut the throats
of the men, women and children and burn
the town of Montgomery". It will not
tax the imagination to understand what
panic words like that could cause in the
light of the fact that any communication
was limited to letters carried by a
postman on horseback or by the spoken word
with the very certain differences in
interpretations. Following this event, I
liked the next words and sentence
structure Mr. Renfro, the author used to
tell about the action taken, "a
number of citizens of the county met in
the town of Montgomery and appointed a
committee of moderate men to wait on Mr.
Rentfro and inform him that his atrocious
threat, together with his turbulent and
vicious conduct, ever since he had come to
reside in the county, had rendered him so
obnoxious to public sentiment and good
morals, that relief from his presence in
the county was immediately desired".
Would that, it worked so easily for us
today?
To be continued next week.
|